The entire print medium has “no credibility”



David Smith, CEO of Sinclair Broadcast Group, pictured September 8, 1998.
Photo: Portland Press Herald / Getty Images

David Smith, executive chairman of Sinclair Broadcast Group, has said he fundamentally dislikes and distrusts print media, which he says “is of no use.” In emails to new York, Smith said that print – like in newspapers and magazines – is a leftist reality-distorting tool. The print media, he said, has “no credibility” and no relevance.

“I have to say that in the more than 45 years that I have worked in the media field, I have never seen a single article about us that reflects reality, especially in today’s world with a shameful political environment. and a general lack of integrity. The facts and the truth have been long lost and will probably never come back, ”Smith said.

“The print media is so much on the left that it is just meaningless dribbling, which is why the industry is and will disappear. Just no credibility.

Smith may not be as identifiable as Rupert Murdoch or Jeff Bezos, but he’s just as powerful; his influence saturates American homes through the 193 television stations he owns or controls, spread over 39 states, from New York to California (although concentrated in the South and the Midwest).

Founded as the Chesapeake Television Corporation in 1971 by his father, Julian Sinclair Smith, his company began to expand and changed its name to Sinclair Broadcasting Company in 1985, the year before the Fox Broadcasting Company was launched. David Smith and his brothers took control of the business; previously, David had been a partner at Cine Processors, a pirated porn maker owned by eldest Smith’s company, the Commercial Radio Institute, according to a 2005 report. story in Rolling stone. Fox News is generally credited with the media-induced changes in the conservative movement, and in American politics more broadly, over the past two decades. But in the Trump era, Sinclair’s creeping dominance has become more evident.

The topic has generated some interest over the past year, in part due to a long segment on Last week tonight with John Oliver, Sinclair became the subject of a horrified fascination in a more common way over the weekend, when Deadspin released a super cup of dozens of its anchors, from San Antonio, Michigan, reciting an on-air anti-media script.

The bizarre video, in which dozens of well-groomed men and women robotically read the same words and phrases into the camera in segments from the past month, has gone viral, enticing tens of thousands of retweets and millions of views.

“We are concerned about the disturbing trend of irresponsible and one-sided news in our country,” Sinclair’s script reads. “Unfortunately, some members of the media use their platforms to push their own biases and personal agendas in order to control exactly what people think. It is extremely dangerous for a democracy.

On Monday, 15 minutes before he was scheduled to host a breakfast for the White House Easter Egg Roll, President Donald Trump took a break from his central morning activities – plunging China into war commercial and taking a stand for his anti-immigrant supporters – to defend Sinclair on Twitter. “So funny to watch Fake News Networks, one of the most dishonest groups of people I’ve ever dealt with, criticize Sinclair Broadcasting for its bias,” he said. “Sinclair is far superior to CNN and even more superior to Fake NBC, which is a complete joke.”

new York contacted Smith in mid-November, after requesting an interview. “I appreciate your interest in your urge to make a story, but we don’t speak to print media as a general principle because we find them to be so devoid of reality and of no use. Have a great vacation, ”Smith said in response. Later he added: “Again, my experience has always been that even with an interview, it has no consequences in terms of spin, facts or distortion, political inclination, etc. the industry is and will disappear. Just no credibility. see you.”

For a far-right expert or politician, statements like Smith’s have become expected in the Trump era. But from one of the country’s most powerful media executives, they are not. We generally speak of “media” as if it were a monolith, without distinction between news or opinion, journalists or columnists, presenters or commentators. To cast doubt on certain sections of the industry is therefore to risk disrupting the faith that remains in the entire range. And if TV is the only pure and honest source of information, what about TV channel websites like Where, where do the reports that are technically considered printed appear? Or what about TV reports illuminated by stories from New York Times or Washington To post? Is information that does not come directly from Sinclair or from David Smith himself suspect? Maybe that’s the idea.

When new York Asked Smith if he would be open to at least one informal meeting, he replied, “I also learned that there is no such thing as unofficial. Bye.”



Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.